Current:Home > Contact-usCourt revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Court revives Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times
View Date:2024-12-23 20:54:19
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court revived Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times on Wednesday, citing errors by a lower court judge, particularly his decision to dismiss the lawsuit while a jury was deliberating.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan wrote that Judge Jed S. Rakoff’s decision in February 2022 to dismiss the lawsuit mid-deliberations improperly intruded on the jury’s work.
It also found that the erroneous exclusion of evidence, an inaccurate jury instruction and an erroneous response to a question from the jury tainted the jury’s decision to rule against Palin. It declined, however, to grant Palin’s request to force Rakoff off the case on grounds he was biased against her. The 2nd Circuit said she had offered no proof.
The libel lawsuit by Palin, a onetime Republican vice presidential candidate and former governor of Alaska, centered on the newspaper’s 2017 editorial falsely linking her campaign rhetoric to a mass shooting, which Palin asserted damaged her reputation and career.
The Times acknowledged its editorial was inaccurate but said it quickly corrected errors it called an “honest mistake” that were never meant to harm Palin.
Shane Vogt, a lawyer for Palin, said he was reviewing the opinion.
Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson for the Times, said the decision was disappointing. “We’re confident we will prevail in a retrial,” he said in an email.
The 2nd Circuit, in a ruling written by Judge John M. Walker Jr., reversed the jury verdict, along with Rakoff’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit while jurors were deliberating.
Despite his ruling, Rakoff let jurors finish deliberating and render their verdict, which went against Palin.
The appeals court noted that Rakoff’s ruling made credibility determinations, weighed evidence, and ignored facts or inferences that a reasonable juror could plausibly find supported Palin’s case.
It also described how “push notifications” that reached the cellphones of jurors “came as an unfortunate surprise to the district judge.” The 2nd Circuit said it was not enough that the judge’s law clerk was assured by jurors that Rakoff’s ruling had not affected their deliberations.
“Given a judge’s special position of influence with a jury, we think a jury’s verdict reached with the knowledge of the judge’s already-announced disposition of the case will rarely be untainted, no matter what the jurors say upon subsequent inquiry,” the appeals court said.
In its ruling Wednesday, the 2nd Circuit said it was granting a new trial because of various trial errors and because Rakoff’s mid-deliberations ruling against Palin, which might have reached jurors through alerts delivered to cell phones, “impugn the reliability of that verdict.”
“The jury is sacrosanct in our legal system, and we have a duty to protect its constitutional role, both by ensuring that the jury’s role is not usurped by judges and by making certain that juries are provided with relevant proffered evidence and properly instructed on the law,” the appeals court said.
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Florida man’s US charges upgraded to killing his estranged wife in Spain
- Diaper Bag Essentials Checklist: Here Are the Must-Have Products I Can't Live Without
- I’m an Expert SKIMS Shopper and I Predict These Styles Will Sell out This Month
- Horoscopes Today, August 11, 2024
- Waymo’s robotaxis now open to anyone who wants a driverless ride in Los Angeles
- Diaper Bag Essentials Checklist: Here Are the Must-Have Products I Can't Live Without
- Katie Couric says CBS' decision to replace Norah O'Donnell with 2 men is 'out of touch'
- NFL preseason winners, losers: Caleb Williams, rookie QBs sizzle in debuts
- Federal judge orders Oakland airport to stop using ‘San Francisco’ in name amid lawsuit
- I’m an Expert SKIMS Shopper and I Predict These Styles Will Sell out This Month
Ranking
- What is ‘Doge’? Explaining the meme and cryptocurrency after Elon Musk's appointment to D.O.G.E.
- Vance backs Trump’s support for a presidential ‘say’ on Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy
- Prince William Debuts New Beard Alongside Kate Middleton in Olympics Video
- George Santos wants jury pool in his fraud trial questioned over their opinions of him
- Gossip Girl Actress Chanel Banks Reported Missing After Vanishing in California
- 17 RushTok-Approved Essentials to Help You Survive Rush Week 2024, Starting at Just $2
- Country Singer Parker McCollum Welcomes First Baby With Wife Hallie Ray Light
- The Latest: Harris begins policy rollout; material from Trump campaign leaked to news outlets
Recommendation
-
Gavin Rossdale Makes Rare Public Appearance With Girlfriend Xhoana Xheneti
-
Utah's famed Double Arch collapses, underscores fragility of National Park features
-
Hoda Kotb Shares Reason Why She and Fiancé Joel Schiffman Broke Up
-
Judge rules against RFK Jr. in fight to be on New York’s ballot, says he is not a state resident
-
These Yellowstone Gift Guide Picks Will Make You Feel Like You’re on the Dutton Ranch
-
Injured Ferguson police officer wanted to improve department ‘from the inside,’ ex-supervisor says
-
Jets shoot down Haason Reddick's trade request amid star pass rusher's holdout
-
Matt Kuchar bizarrely stops playing on 72nd hole of Wyndham Championship